Estonia vs Ghana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Estonia
- Ghana
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 4.61 million current US$ against 3.56 million current US$ in Ghana, a difference of 1.05 million current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.3 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Ghana ahead.
Estonia ranks 54th and Ghana ranks 56th of 142 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.36 million current US$ | 2.08 million current US$ | 8.28 million current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 3.99 million current US$ | 2.03 million current US$ | 1.96 million current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Ghana?
- Estonia, at 4.61 million current US$ against 3.56 million current US$ in Ghana as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Ghana?
- 1.05 million current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Ghana?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Ghana rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 54th and Ghana ranks 56th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.