Estonia vs Honduras: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Estonia
- Honduras
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 4.61 million current US$ against 3.66 million current US$ in Honduras, a difference of 946,150 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.3 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 54th and Honduras ranks 55th of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.36 million current US$ | 4.20 million current US$ | 6.16 million current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 3.99 million current US$ | 25.03 million current US$ | 21.04 million current US$ | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Honduras?
- Estonia, at 4.61 million current US$ against 3.66 million current US$ in Honduras as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Honduras?
- 946,150 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Honduras?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Honduras rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 54th and Honduras ranks 55th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.