Estonia vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Estonia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.73 million current US$ against 4.61 million current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 1.12 million current US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 51st of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.36 million current US$ | 10.08 million current US$ | 274,444 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 3.99 million current US$ | 7.92 million current US$ | 3.93 million current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 5.73 million current US$ against 4.61 million current US$ in Estonia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Latvia?
- 1.12 million current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Latvia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 51st of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.