Euro area vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Euro area
- Serbia
How they compare
Euro area currently reports 17.50 million current US$ against 14.62 million current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 2.88 million current US$.
That makes Euro area's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Euro area ahead.
Euro area ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 36th of 46 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Euro area averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Euro area | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.70 million current US$ | 17.22 million current US$ | 18.48 million current US$ | Euro area |
| 2000s | 23.97 million current US$ | 33.47 million current US$ | 9.50 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Euro area or Serbia?
- Euro area, at 17.50 million current US$ against 14.62 million current US$ in Serbia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Euro area and Serbia?
- 2.88 million current US$, with Euro area ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Serbia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2004.
- How do Euro area and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Euro area ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 36th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.