Europe & Central Asia vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps

Europe & Central Asia
441.21 million current US$
in 2023
Zambia
39.66 million current US$
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
19th
Zambia rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Zambia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196019912023

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia currently reports 441.21 million current US$ against 39.66 million current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 401.55 million current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia's figure about 11.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Europe & Central Asia ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 18th of 46 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 667,857 current US$ 142,143 current US$ 525,714 current US$ Europe & Central Asia
1970s 467,000 current US$ 10.08 million current US$ 9.61 million current US$ Zambia
1980s 601,000 current US$ 30.18 million current US$ 29.58 million current US$ Zambia
1990s 70.38 million current US$ 39.06 million current US$ 31.32 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2000s 143.23 million current US$ 31.42 million current US$ 111.81 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2010s 167.11 million current US$ 45.08 million current US$ 122.04 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2020s 292.24 million current US$ 49.70 million current US$ 242.53 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Europe & Central Asia or Zambia?
Europe & Central Asia, at 441.21 million current US$ against 39.66 million current US$ in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Europe & Central Asia and Zambia?
401.55 million current US$, with Europe & Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Zambia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 18th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/zambia/">Europe & Central Asia vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,726 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.