Fiji vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Fiji
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 210,236 current US$ against 198,055 current US$ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 12,181 current US$.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Fiji ranks 115th and Uzbekistan ranks 116th of 142 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,000 current US$ | 500,000 current US$ | 485,000 current US$ | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 265,145 current US$ | 123,209 current US$ | 141,936 current US$ | Fiji |
| 2020s | 221,883 current US$ | 199,466 current US$ | 22,416 current US$ | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Fiji or Uzbekistan?
- Fiji, at 210,236 current US$ against 198,055 current US$ in Uzbekistan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Fiji and Uzbekistan?
- 12,181 current US$, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Uzbekistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
- How do Fiji and Uzbekistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Fiji ranks 115th and Uzbekistan ranks 116th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.