Jamaica vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Jamaica
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 7,022 current US$ in Jamaica, a difference of 12,978 current US$.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 2.8 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 141st and Slovenia ranks 138th of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 960,000 current US$ | 85,000 current US$ | 875,000 current US$ | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 233,333 current US$ | 273,333 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Jamaica or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 20,000 current US$ against 7,022 current US$ in Jamaica as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Jamaica and Slovenia?
- 12,978 current US$, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Slovenia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2002.
- How do Jamaica and Slovenia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Jamaica ranks 141st and Slovenia ranks 138th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.