Jordan vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Jordan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.73 million current US$ against 5.45 million current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 275,070 current US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 52nd and Latvia ranks 51st of 142 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.09 million current US$ | 10.08 million current US$ | 7.99 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.59 million current US$ | 7.92 million current US$ | 6.33 million current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Jordan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 5.73 million current US$ against 5.45 million current US$ in Jordan as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Jordan and Latvia?
- 275,070 current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Latvia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Jordan and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Jordan ranks 52nd and Latvia ranks 51st of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.