Mali vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Mali
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 49.28 million current US$ against 44.50 million current US$ in Mali, a difference of 4.78 million current US$.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 12th of 142 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.90 million current US$ | 44.68 million current US$ | 7.78 million current US$ | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 41.88 million current US$ | 70.43 million current US$ | 28.55 million current US$ | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Mali or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 49.28 million current US$ against 44.50 million current US$ in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Mali and South Sudan?
- 4.78 million current US$, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Mali and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Mali ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 12th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.