Mauritius vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Mauritius
- Samoa
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 53,848 current US$ against 39,574 current US$ in Samoa, a difference of 14,274 current US$.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.4 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 132nd and Samoa ranks 133rd of 142 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 508,571 current US$ | 181,429 current US$ | 327,143 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 138,641 current US$ | 19,179 current US$ | 119,462 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 6,447 current US$ | 78,083 current US$ | 71,636 current US$ | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Mauritius or Samoa?
- Mauritius, at 53,848 current US$ against 39,574 current US$ in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Mauritius and Samoa?
- 14,274 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Samoa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
- How do Mauritius and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Mauritius ranks 132nd and Samoa ranks 133rd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.