Republic of Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps

Republic of Moldova
49.29 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
55.91 million current US$
in 2023
Republic of Moldova rank
11th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
9th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
050.0M100.0M150.0M196219922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 55.91 million current US$ against 49.29 million current US$ in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 6.62 million current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 11th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 9th of 142 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 1.08 million current US$ 51.41 million current US$ 50.33 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 9.30 million current US$ 85.59 million current US$ 76.29 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 14.88 million current US$ 104.15 million current US$ 89.27 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 28.96 million current US$ 67.88 million current US$ 38.92 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Republic of Moldova or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 55.91 million current US$ against 49.29 million current US$ in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?
6.62 million current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
Republic of Moldova ranks 11th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 9th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/moldova/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/moldova/tanzania/">Republic of Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,726 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.