Poland vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Poland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 1.33 million current US$ against 1.17 million current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 164,290 current US$.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.
Poland ranks 78th and Tunisia ranks 81st of 142 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.43 million current US$ | 4.84 million current US$ | 19.59 million current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 3.72 million current US$ | 420,000 current US$ | 3.30 million current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Poland or Tunisia?
- Poland, at 1.33 million current US$ against 1.17 million current US$ in Tunisia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Poland and Tunisia?
- 164,290 current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tunisia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Poland and Tunisia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Poland ranks 78th and Tunisia ranks 81st of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.