Slovenia vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Slovenia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 23,641 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Slovenia, a difference of 3,641 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Uruguay ahead.
Slovenia ranks 138th and Uruguay ranks 137th of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 85,000 current US$ | 765,000 current US$ | 680,000 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 273,333 current US$ | 113,333 current US$ | 160,000 current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Slovenia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 23,641 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Slovenia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Slovenia and Uruguay?
- 3,641 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2002.
- How do Slovenia and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Slovenia ranks 138th and Uruguay ranks 137th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.