South Sudan vs Syria: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden gaps over time
- South Sudan
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 52.92 million current US$ against 49.28 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 3.64 million current US$.
That makes Syria's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 12th and Syria ranks 10th of 142 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.68 million current US$ | 43.32 million current US$ | 1.36 million current US$ | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 70.43 million current US$ | 63.23 million current US$ | 7.20 million current US$ | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, South Sudan or Syria?
- Syria, at 52.92 million current US$ against 49.28 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between South Sudan and Syria?
- 3.64 million current US$, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Syria?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Syria rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- South Sudan ranks 12th and Syria ranks 10th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.