Eswatini vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Eswatini
40.3 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
45.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
49th
Timor-Leste rank
46th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Timor-Leste
0100200300400196519942023

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 45.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 4.72 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 49th and Timor-Leste ranks 46th of 141 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Timor-Leste in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1970s 88.37 current US$ per square kilometre 9.41 current US$ per square kilometre 78.96 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 69.19 current US$ per square kilometre 19.73 current US$ per square kilometre 49.46 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre 9.41 current US$ per square kilometre 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre 275.27 current US$ per square kilometre 269.46 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2010s 31.19 current US$ per square kilometre 67.6 current US$ per square kilometre 36.41 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 26.17 current US$ per square kilometre 42.8 current US$ per square kilometre 16.63 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Eswatini or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 45.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Eswatini and Timor-Leste?
4.72 current US$ per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Timor-Leste?
27 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Timor-Leste rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 49th and Timor-Leste ranks 46th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/timor-leste/">Eswatini vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.