Euro area vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Euro area
6.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Zimbabwe
87.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Euro area
  • Zimbabwe
050100150196319932023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 81.36 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 14.2 times Euro area's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.006 current US$ per square kilometre 55.54 current US$ per square kilometre 55.53 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 10.92 current US$ per square kilometre 86.18 current US$ per square kilometre 75.26 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 8.45 current US$ per square kilometre 28.06 current US$ per square kilometre 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Euro area or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Euro area and Zimbabwe?
81.36 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Zimbabwe?
17 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2004.
How do Euro area and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Euro area ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/zimbabwe/">Euro area vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.