Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
15.56 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Latvia
92.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
30th
Latvia rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Latvia
050100150200250197019962022

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 92.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 15.56 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 76.52 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 5.9 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 29th of 46 groups.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 4.3 current US$ per square kilometre 180.61 current US$ per square kilometre 176.3 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 6.46 current US$ per square kilometre 127.34 current US$ per square kilometre 120.88 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Latvia?
Latvia, at 92.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 15.56 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
76.52 current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 29th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/latvia/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.