Georgia vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Georgia
315.58 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
46.84 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Georgia rank
11th
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
8th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Georgia
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0100200300400197019962023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 315.58 current US$ per square kilometre against 46.84 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 268.74 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 6.7 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.

Georgia ranks 11th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 8th of 141 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1990s 22.69 current US$ per square kilometre 29.76 current US$ per square kilometre 7.07 current US$ per square kilometre South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 114.61 current US$ per square kilometre 35.35 current US$ per square kilometre 79.26 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 237.44 current US$ per square kilometre 57.51 current US$ per square kilometre 179.92 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 248.98 current US$ per square kilometre 53.2 current US$ per square kilometre 195.78 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Georgia or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
Georgia, at 315.58 current US$ per square kilometre against 46.84 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Georgia and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
268.74 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Georgia and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Georgia ranks 11th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 8th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Georgia vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.