Guatemala vs Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Guatemala
119.36 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Small states
16.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Guatemala rank
22nd
Small states rank
25th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Small states
0100200300400196919962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 119.36 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.25 current US$ per square kilometre in Small states, a difference of 103.11 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 7.3 times Small states's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Small states ahead.

Guatemala ranks 22nd and Small states ranks 25th of 141 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Small states in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Small states Difference Ahead
1970s 0.591 current US$ per square kilometre 21.19 current US$ per square kilometre 20.6 current US$ per square kilometre Small states
1980s 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre 57.72 current US$ per square kilometre 56.15 current US$ per square kilometre Small states
1990s 59.14 current US$ per square kilometre 85.64 current US$ per square kilometre 26.5 current US$ per square kilometre Small states
2000s 182.05 current US$ per square kilometre 28.24 current US$ per square kilometre 153.81 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 276.29 current US$ per square kilometre 12.38 current US$ per square kilometre 263.9 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 272.6 current US$ per square kilometre 11.78 current US$ per square kilometre 260.82 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Guatemala or Small states?
Guatemala, at 119.36 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.25 current US$ per square kilometre in Small states as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Guatemala and Small states?
103.11 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Small states?
40 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Guatemala and Small states rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 22nd and Small states ranks 25th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/small-states/">Guatemala vs Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.