High income vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

High income
0.0294 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
45.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
45th
East Timor rank
46th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • High income
  • East Timor
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 45.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0294 current US$ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 44.99 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1,532.2 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1975 it was East Timor ahead.

High income ranks 45th and East Timor ranks 46th of 46 groups.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income East Timor Difference Ahead
1970s -0.0024 current US$ per square kilometre 9.41 current US$ per square kilometre 9.42 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
1980s 0.006 current US$ per square kilometre 19.73 current US$ per square kilometre 19.72 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
1990s 0.3961 current US$ per square kilometre 31.94 current US$ per square kilometre 31.55 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 0.1427 current US$ per square kilometre 282.92 current US$ per square kilometre 282.78 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 0.0111 current US$ per square kilometre 93.39 current US$ per square kilometre 93.38 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 0.0247 current US$ per square kilometre 42.8 current US$ per square kilometre 42.78 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, High income or East Timor?
East Timor, at 45.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0294 current US$ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between High income and East Timor?
44.99 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and East Timor?
33 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do High income and East Timor rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
High income ranks 45th and East Timor ranks 46th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/timor-leste/">High income vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.