High income vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

High income
0.0294 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
53.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
45th
Zambia rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • High income
  • Zambia
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 53.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0294 current US$ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 53.32 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1,815.8 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1963 it was High income ahead.

High income ranks 45th and Zambia ranks 43rd of 46 groups.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0124 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2368 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2243 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0255 current US$ per square kilometre 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre 13.53 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0504 current US$ per square kilometre 40.6 current US$ per square kilometre 40.55 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.4522 current US$ per square kilometre 52.54 current US$ per square kilometre 52.09 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.1427 current US$ per square kilometre 42.27 current US$ per square kilometre 42.12 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0111 current US$ per square kilometre 60.63 current US$ per square kilometre 60.62 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0247 current US$ per square kilometre 66.86 current US$ per square kilometre 66.84 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, High income or Zambia?
Zambia, at 53.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0294 current US$ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between High income and Zambia?
53.32 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do High income and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
High income ranks 45th and Zambia ranks 43rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/zambia/">High income vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.