IBRD only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

IBRD only
7.49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
87.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • IBRD only
  • Zimbabwe
050100150196319932023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.49 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 80.04 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 11.7 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1971 it was IBRD only ahead.

IBRD only ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4456 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3164 current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
1980s 3.86 current US$ per square kilometre 48.97 current US$ per square kilometre 45.11 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 5.82 current US$ per square kilometre 86.18 current US$ per square kilometre 80.35 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre 41.88 current US$ per square kilometre 36.12 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 5.16 current US$ per square kilometre 94.69 current US$ per square kilometre 89.53 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre 110.01 current US$ per square kilometre 103.59 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, IBRD only or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.49 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between IBRD only and Zimbabwe?
80.04 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Zimbabwe?
45 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
IBRD only ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/zimbabwe/">IBRD only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.