IDA total vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

IDA total
49.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Liberia
345.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA total rank
7th
Liberia rank
10th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • IDA total
  • Liberia
0200400600196219922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 345.39 current US$ per square kilometre against 49.25 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total, a difference of 296.14 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Liberia's figure about 7.0 times IDA total's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IDA total ahead.

IDA total ranks 7th and Liberia ranks 10th of 46 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IDA total averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA total Liberia Difference Ahead
1970s 5.19 current US$ per square kilometre 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre IDA total
1980s 15.88 current US$ per square kilometre 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre 14.27 current US$ per square kilometre IDA total
1990s 23.32 current US$ per square kilometre 28.48 current US$ per square kilometre 5.16 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2000s 33.61 current US$ per square kilometre 144.64 current US$ per square kilometre 111.03 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2010s 48.59 current US$ per square kilometre 356.65 current US$ per square kilometre 308.06 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 55.16 current US$ per square kilometre 389.6 current US$ per square kilometre 334.43 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, IDA total or Liberia?
Liberia, at 345.39 current US$ per square kilometre against 49.25 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between IDA total and Liberia?
296.14 current US$ per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Liberia?
45 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA total and Liberia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
IDA total ranks 7th and Liberia ranks 10th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA total vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/liberia/">IDA total vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.