Korea vs South Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden square
Korea
7.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
South Africa
5.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Korea rank
91st
South Africa rank
92nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden … Sweden square over time
- Korea
- South Africa
How they compare
Korea currently reports 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Korea's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 91st and South Africa ranks 92nd of 141 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Korea or South Africa?
- Korea, at 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 1999.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Korea and South Africa?
- 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Korea and South Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Korea ranks 91st and South Africa ranks 92nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.