Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Latvia
92.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Zimbabwe
87.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Zimbabwe
050100150200250196319932023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 92.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4.55 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Latvia ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 141 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 180.61 current US$ per square kilometre 84.32 current US$ per square kilometre 96.29 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 127.34 current US$ per square kilometre 28.06 current US$ per square kilometre 99.28 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
Latvia, at 92.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
4.55 current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Latvia ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/">Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.