Montenegro vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

Montenegro
88.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
87.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro rank
31st
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • Montenegro
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400196319932023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 88.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Montenegro ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 141 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 274.72 current US$ per square kilometre 59.86 current US$ per square kilometre 214.86 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 24.86 current US$ per square kilometre 94.69 current US$ per square kilometre 69.83 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 61.49 current US$ per square kilometre 104.39 current US$ per square kilometre 42.9 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, Montenegro or Zimbabwe?
Montenegro, at 88.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between Montenegro and Zimbabwe?
1.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Zimbabwe?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
Montenegro ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/zimbabwe/">Montenegro vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.