OECD members vs Turkey: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per

OECD members
1.48 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Turkey
54.52 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
42nd
Turkey rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time

  • OECD members
  • Turkey
0204060196419932023

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 54.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 53.04 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turkey's figure about 37.0 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Turkey ahead.

OECD members ranks 42nd and Turkey ranks 42nd of 46 groups.

Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Turkey Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0239 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7016 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6777 current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
1980s 0.0769 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8754 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7985 current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
1990s 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5799 current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
2000s 0.9831 current US$ per square kilometre 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
2010s 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre 18.34 current US$ per square kilometre 17.03 current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
2020s 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre 29.18 current US$ per square kilometre 27.31 current US$ per square kilometre Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, OECD members or Turkey?
Turkey, at 54.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between OECD members and Turkey?
53.04 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Turkey?
49 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Turkey rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
OECD members ranks 42nd and Turkey ranks 42nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Turkey: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/turkiye/">OECD members vs Turkey: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 7,260 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.