IDA only vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per
IDA only
0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
South Sudan
0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2015
IDA only rank
5th
South Sudan rank
7th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per over time
- IDA only
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA only, a difference of 0.0021 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 4.1 times IDA only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was IDA only ahead.
IDA only ranks 5th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 46 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per, IDA only or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA only as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per between IDA only and South Sudan?
- 0.0021 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do IDA only and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- IDA only ranks 5th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.