Eswatini vs Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden

Eswatini
693,092 current US$
in 2023
Guinea
826,937 current US$
in 2023
Eswatini rank
97th
Guinea rank
94th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196519942023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 826,937 current US$ against 693,092 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 133,845 current US$.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 97th and Guinea ranks 94th of 142 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 210,000 current US$ 80,000 current US$ 130,000 current US$ Eswatini
1990s 378,571 current US$ 515,714 current US$ 137,143 current US$ Guinea
2000s 100,000 current US$ 821,667 current US$ 721,667 current US$ Guinea
2010s 536,483 current US$ 745,203 current US$ 208,720 current US$ Guinea
2020s 450,206 current US$ 742,260 current US$ 292,054 current US$ Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden, Eswatini or Guinea?
Guinea, at 826,937 current US$ against 693,092 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden between Eswatini and Guinea?
133,845 current US$, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea?
27 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden?
Eswatini ranks 97th and Guinea ranks 94th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us/eswatini/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us/eswatini/guinea/">Eswatini vs Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 7,394 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.