Jamaica vs Papua New Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden

Jamaica
7,022 current US$
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
18,815 current US$
in 2023
Jamaica rank
141st
Papua New Guinea rank
139th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden over time

  • Jamaica
  • Papua New Guinea
01.0M2.0M3.0M197820002023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 18,815 current US$ against 7,022 current US$ in Jamaica, a difference of 11,793 current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.7 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 141st and Papua New Guinea ranks 139th of 142 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 1.48 million current US$ 40,000 current US$ 1.44 million current US$ Jamaica
1990s 623,750 current US$ 143,750 current US$ 480,000 current US$ Jamaica
2000s 203,000 current US$ 110,000 current US$ 93,000 current US$ Jamaica
2010s 14,522 current US$ 695,020 current US$ 680,498 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 72,962 current US$ 15,252 current US$ 57,710 current US$ Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden, Jamaica or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 18,815 current US$ against 7,022 current US$ in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden between Jamaica and Papua New Guinea?
11,793 current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Papua New Guinea?
23 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden?
Jamaica ranks 141st and Papua New Guinea ranks 139th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Papua New Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us/jamaica/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us/jamaica/papua-new-guinea/">Jamaica vs Papua New Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 7,394 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.