Angola vs Belarus: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Angola
- Belarus
How they compare
Angola currently reports 136,131 current US$ against 116,349 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 19,782 current US$.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 112th and Belarus ranks 115th of 152 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.46 million current US$ | 2.65 million current US$ | 196,000 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 464,585 current US$ | 461,404 current US$ | 3,181 current US$ | Angola |
| 2020s | 279,772 current US$ | 293,776 current US$ | 14,003 current US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Angola or Belarus?
- Angola, at 136,131 current US$ against 116,349 current US$ in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Angola and Belarus?
- 19,782 current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Belarus?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Belarus rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Angola ranks 112th and Belarus ranks 115th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.