Belarus vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Belarus
116,349 current US$
in 2023
Uruguay
120,619 current US$
in 2017
Belarus rank
115th
Uruguay rank
114th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 120,619 current US$ against 116,349 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 4,270 current US$.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 115th and Uruguay ranks 114th of 152 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.65 million current US$ | 274,000 current US$ | 2.38 million current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 484,021 current US$ | 72,182 current US$ | 411,839 current US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Belarus or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 120,619 current US$ against 116,349 current US$ in Belarus as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 4,270 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Belarus ranks 115th and Uruguay ranks 114th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.