Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Botswana
20,000 current US$
in 1997
Sao Tome and Principe
20,000 current US$
in 2004
Botswana rank
143rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
143rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Botswana
  • Sao Tome and Principe
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196919862004

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 143rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 143rd of 152 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 45,625 current US$ 77,500 current US$ 31,875 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 44,688 current US$ 80,000 current US$ 35,312 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 30,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Botswana or Sao Tome and Principe?
Botswana, at 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 1997.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 current US$, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
13 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1992.
How do Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Botswana ranks 143rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 143rd of 152 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-gaps-filled/botswana/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-gaps-filled/botswana/sao-tome-and-principe/">Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,834 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.