Croatia vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Croatia
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 80,000 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 122nd and Estonia ranks 121st of 152 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.28 million current US$ | 1.87 million current US$ | 406,000 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 1.70 million current US$ | 68,000 current US$ | 1.63 million current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Croatia or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 80,000 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Croatia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Croatia and Estonia?
- 10,000 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Estonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2004.
- How do Croatia and Estonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Croatia ranks 122nd and Estonia ranks 121st of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.