Croatia vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Croatia
70,000 current US$
in 2010
Slovenia
70,000 current US$
in 2002
Croatia rank
122nd
Slovenia rank
122nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Croatia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 70,000 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Slovenia, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 122nd and Slovenia ranks 122nd of 152 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.65 million current US$ | 240,000 current US$ | 1.41 million current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 2.20 million current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 2.17 million current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Croatia or Slovenia?
- Croatia, at 70,000 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Slovenia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Croatia and Slovenia?
- 0 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Slovenia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2002.
- How do Croatia and Slovenia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Croatia ranks 122nd and Slovenia ranks 122nd of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.