Czechia vs Lesotho: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Czechia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 470,000 current US$ against 366,447 current US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 103,553 current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Czechia ranks 97th and Lesotho ranks 100th of 152 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.65 million current US$ | 1.84 million current US$ | 1.81 million current US$ | Czechia |
| 2000s | 1.63 million current US$ | 736,000 current US$ | 896,000 current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Czechia or Lesotho?
- Czechia, at 470,000 current US$ against 366,447 current US$ in Lesotho as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Czechia and Lesotho?
- 103,553 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lesotho?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Lesotho rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Czechia ranks 97th and Lesotho ranks 100th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.