Georgia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Georgia
15.60 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members
39.41 million current US$
in 2022
Georgia rank
41st
OECD members rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Georgia
  • OECD members
020.0M40.0M60.0M197019962023

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 39.41 million current US$ against 15.60 million current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 23.81 million current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 2.5 times Georgia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, OECD members has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 41st and OECD members ranks 38th of 152 countries.

OECD members has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia OECD members Difference Ahead
1990s 1.86 million current US$ 43.23 million current US$ 41.37 million current US$ OECD members
2000s 5.74 million current US$ 17.63 million current US$ 11.89 million current US$ OECD members
2010s 9.47 million current US$ 33.63 million current US$ 24.16 million current US$ OECD members
2020s 9.98 million current US$ 43.21 million current US$ 33.23 million current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Georgia or OECD members?
OECD members, at 39.41 million current US$ against 15.60 million current US$ in Georgia as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Georgia and OECD members?
23.81 million current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and OECD members?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do Georgia and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Georgia ranks 41st and OECD members ranks 38th of 152 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-gaps-filled/georgia/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-gaps-filled/georgia/oecd-members/">Georgia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,834 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.