Least developed countries vs Republic of Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Least developed countries
649.96 million current US$
in 2022
Republic of Moldova
40.06 million current US$
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
11th
Republic of Moldova rank
8th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Republic of Moldova
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197019962023

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 649.96 million current US$ against 40.06 million current US$ in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 609.90 million current US$.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 16.2 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 11th and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 44 groups.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 175.20 million current US$ 623,333 current US$ 174.58 million current US$ Least developed countries
2000s 257.02 million current US$ 4.47 million current US$ 252.55 million current US$ Least developed countries
2010s 543.23 million current US$ 12.43 million current US$ 530.81 million current US$ Least developed countries
2020s 668.26 million current US$ 22.26 million current US$ 646.00 million current US$ Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Least developed countries or Republic of Moldova?
Least developed countries, at 649.96 million current US$ against 40.06 million current US$ in Republic of Moldova as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Least developed countries and Republic of Moldova?
609.90 million current US$, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Republic of Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Least developed countries and Republic of Moldova rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Least developed countries ranks 11th and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Republic of Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/moldova/">Least developed countries vs Republic of Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,834 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.