Lithuania vs Malaysia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Lithuania
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 66,303 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 6,303 current US$.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malaysia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 126th and Malaysia ranks 125th of 152 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.96 million current US$ | 213,333 current US$ | 1.75 million current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 142,000 current US$ | 119,000 current US$ | 23,000 current US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Lithuania or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 66,303 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Lithuania and Malaysia?
- 6,303 current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malaysia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Lithuania and Malaysia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Lithuania ranks 126th and Malaysia ranks 125th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.