Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Nepal
35.30 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
34.66 million current US$
in 2023
Nepal rank
15th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Nepal
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 35.30 million current US$ against 34.66 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 632,700 current US$.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 15th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 17th of 152 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 327,143 current US$ 77,143 current US$ 250,000 current US$ Nepal
1970s 2.07 million current US$ 840,000 current US$ 1.23 million current US$ Nepal
1980s 10.69 million current US$ 11.69 million current US$ 995,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 13.92 million current US$ 18.83 million current US$ 4.91 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 16.73 million current US$ 22.94 million current US$ 6.20 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 40.82 million current US$ 30.06 million current US$ 10.76 million current US$ Nepal
2020s 38.42 million current US$ 32.78 million current US$ 5.64 million current US$ Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Nepal or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Nepal, at 35.30 million current US$ against 34.66 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of?
632,700 current US$, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of?
61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Nepal ranks 15th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 17th of 152 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-gaps-filled/nepal/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-gaps-filled/nepal/tanzania/">Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,834 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.