Poland vs Sierra Leone: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Poland
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Poland currently reports 200,000 current US$ against 165,587 current US$ in Sierra Leone, a difference of 34,413 current US$.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 107th and Sierra Leone ranks 109th of 152 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.65 million current US$ | 849,000 current US$ | 9.80 million current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 308,000 current US$ | 4.38 million current US$ | 4.07 million current US$ | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Poland or Sierra Leone?
- Poland, at 200,000 current US$ against 165,587 current US$ in Sierra Leone as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Poland and Sierra Leone?
- 34,413 current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sierra Leone?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Poland and Sierra Leone rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Poland ranks 107th and Sierra Leone ranks 109th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.