Romania vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time
- Romania
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 10.29 million current US$ against 9.52 million current US$ in Romania, a difference of 769,700 current US$.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Romania ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 53rd of 152 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.12 million current US$ | 14.54 million current US$ | 9.42 million current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 9.06 million current US$ | 5.14 million current US$ | 3.93 million current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Romania or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 10.29 million current US$ against 9.52 million current US$ in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Romania and Rwanda?
- 769,700 current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Rwanda?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Romania and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Romania ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 53rd of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) with 344 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.