Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
429.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
417.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
11th
Rwanda rank
13th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Rwanda
02004006008001.0k196319932023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 429.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 417.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 12.72 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Rwanda ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 286.37 current US$ per square kilometre 499.64 current US$ per square kilometre 213.27 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 302.6 current US$ per square kilometre 215.2 current US$ per square kilometre 87.4 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 454.64 current US$ per square kilometre 215.82 current US$ per square kilometre 238.83 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 459.47 current US$ per square kilometre 328.41 current US$ per square kilometre 131.06 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Rwanda?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 429.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 417.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda?
12.72 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/rwanda/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.