Central Europe and the Baltics vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.0634 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Eswatini
53.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
42nd
Eswatini rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Eswatini
0255075100125197319982023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 53.06 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0634 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 53 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 836.9 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 42nd and Eswatini ranks 41st of 44 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 18.02 current US$ per square kilometre 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre 14.53 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 6.65 current US$ per square kilometre 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 0.0634 current US$ per square kilometre 6.4 current US$ per square kilometre 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Central Europe and the Baltics or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 53.06 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0634 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Central Europe and the Baltics and Eswatini?
53 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Eswatini?
7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 42nd and Eswatini ranks 41st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/eswatini/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.