Eswatini vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Eswatini
53.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
45.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
41st
Mozambique rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mozambique
0255075100125196719952023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 53.06 current US$ per square kilometre against 45.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 8.01 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 41st and Mozambique ranks 44th of 151 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5595 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6033 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre 9.06 current US$ per square kilometre 5.45 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre 27.82 current US$ per square kilometre 24.33 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre 29.58 current US$ per square kilometre 25.95 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 18.51 current US$ per square kilometre 41.07 current US$ per square kilometre 22.56 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 57.98 current US$ per square kilometre 41.81 current US$ per square kilometre 16.17 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Eswatini or Mozambique?
Eswatini, at 53.06 current US$ per square kilometre against 45.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Eswatini and Mozambique?
8.01 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mozambique?
28 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mozambique rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 41st and Mozambique ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mozambique/">Eswatini vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.