Eswatini vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Eswatini
53.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
1.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Eswatini rank
41st
OECD members rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • OECD members
0255075100125197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 53.06 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 51.94 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 47.6 times OECD members's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 41st and OECD members ranks 41st of 151 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre 0.055 current US$ per square kilometre 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1021 current US$ per square kilometre 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4969 current US$ per square kilometre 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4617 current US$ per square kilometre 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 18.51 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9474 current US$ per square kilometre 17.57 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 59.62 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 58.39 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Eswatini or OECD members?
Eswatini, at 53.06 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Eswatini and OECD members?
51.94 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and OECD members?
27 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 41st and OECD members ranks 41st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/oecd-members/">Eswatini vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.