Guatemala vs Mali: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Guatemala
35.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
33.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
50th
Mali rank
51st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mali
0204060196319932023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 35.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 33.55 current US$ per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 50th and Mali ranks 51st of 151 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and Mali in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1244 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0191 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1053 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5296 current US$ per square kilometre 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre 5.39 current US$ per square kilometre 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre Mali
1990s 22 current US$ per square kilometre 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre 15.25 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 25.39 current US$ per square kilometre 7.93 current US$ per square kilometre 17.46 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 31.89 current US$ per square kilometre 25.44 current US$ per square kilometre 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 36.88 current US$ per square kilometre 33.97 current US$ per square kilometre 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Guatemala or Mali?
Guatemala, at 35.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 33.55 current US$ per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Guatemala and Mali?
1.65 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mali?
55 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Mali rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Guatemala ranks 50th and Mali ranks 51st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mali: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mali/">Guatemala vs Mali: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.