Mauritius vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Mauritius
14.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Uganda
15.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
82nd
Uganda rank
80th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Uganda
-2000200196819952023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 82nd and Uganda ranks 80th of 151 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 9.85 current US$ per square kilometre 0.05 current US$ per square kilometre 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 40.5 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4226 current US$ per square kilometre 40.08 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 12.04 current US$ per square kilometre 8.45 current US$ per square kilometre 3.59 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 12.81 current US$ per square kilometre 26.46 current US$ per square kilometre 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 8.65 current US$ per square kilometre 17.67 current US$ per square kilometre 9.02 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 14.57 current US$ per square kilometre 14.48 current US$ per square kilometre 0.087 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Mauritius or Uganda?
Uganda, at 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Mauritius and Uganda?
1.16 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Uganda?
28 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2020.
How do Mauritius and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Mauritius ranks 82nd and Uganda ranks 80th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/uganda/">Mauritius vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.