OECD members vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

OECD members
1.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Sri Lanka
59.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
41st
Sri Lanka rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • OECD members
  • Sri Lanka
050100150200196919962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 59.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 58.56 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 53.5 times OECD members's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 41st and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 44 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.1486 current US$ per square kilometre 48.27 current US$ per square kilometre 48.12 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre 60.12 current US$ per square kilometre 58.97 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0.4967 current US$ per square kilometre 94.35 current US$ per square kilometre 93.86 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0.9474 current US$ per square kilometre 112.56 current US$ per square kilometre 111.62 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 79.88 current US$ per square kilometre 78.66 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), OECD members or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 59.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between OECD members and Sri Lanka?
58.56 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Sri Lanka?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
OECD members ranks 41st and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/sri-lanka/">OECD members vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.