Pakistan vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)

Pakistan
2.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
3.52 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
104th
Zambia rank
101st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Zambia
0102030196319932023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 3.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.53 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 104th and Zambia ranks 101st of 151 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.107 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0605 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0465 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0982 current US$ per square kilometre 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 15.97 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9833 current US$ per square kilometre 14.98 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 18.68 current US$ per square kilometre 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre 17.67 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 22.11 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7199 current US$ per square kilometre 21.39 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$), Pakistan or Zambia?
Zambia, at 3.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) between Pakistan and Zambia?
0.53 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Zambia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Pakistan ranks 104th and Zambia ranks 101st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/zambia/">Pakistan vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.